11 Jan 2017 13:34:45
If at all possible would like to get reds and eds stance on the sakho situation. if what we read to be true (and I know ed002 has gave us up to date details recently) liverpool have supposedly put a £20mil price tag on his head and as things stand don't want a loan deal (which may change closer to window closing, which I think seems daft reading that if true because surley any clubs wanting him on loan will jus wait until the final couple days of the window) as a player I liked sakho and thought he was our best cb last year and was much better on the ball than given credit for, his contract runs till 2020 so has still a few good years on it plus after his form last year got himself back into the French national side. 20mil to me doesn't seem like a daft figure to quote interested parties if I'm honest. clubs usually have a figure in mind what they want for a player and it is upto the buying club weather they think that price is acceptable or if they want to try negotiate a deal for slightly less or other things based on appearances so on so forth. MANY times I feel liverpool have overpaid for players and seem to sell them on for a major loss jus to balance the books but other clubs seem to still get top dollar for the players that they seem to sell on, I will use United situation with schniderlain at the minute, clearly doesn't feature in mourinho long term plans and seem to be selling him on for pretty much what they paid for him. again this is because the buying club ( everton) see this as a fair price and just because a player isn't wanted/ needed buy his club it doesn't mean that he won't be wanted or needed by another. anyways enough of my rant hopefully a deal can be struck by another club and lfc won't have to fork out a large portion of wages plus loose out on a transfer fee aswel.

1.) 11 Jan 2017
11 Jan 2017 15:48:49
If Stones is worth 50 million then 20 for Salhouse is a steal.

I wish there was some other way to resolve the situation but it doesn't look possible.

Sakhos distribution out of defence was a great benefit to the team compared with Lovren and Klaven.

{Ed002's Note - It is nothing whatsoever to do with John Stones.}

2.) 11 Jan 2017
11 Jan 2017 17:15:53
It was just a casual comparison of the sort fans often make and perfectly valid. Sahko is definitely worth two-fifths of a Stones 🤣

3.) 11 Jan 2017
11 Jan 2017 17:41:49
The club has a price they deem fair in the current market.
I don't see why anyone would have a problem with it tbh.