24 Jan 2016 14:36:10
Anyone think it's worth giving caulker a start? He may have his weaknesses, but so do all of our back four, and he can win headers and he is physical.

1.) 24 Jan 2016
24 Jan 2016 15:39:02
I can see him as a good choice versus Stoke.

2.) 24 Jan 2016
24 Jan 2016 15:44:24
Why not convert him into a forward a la Chris Sutton?

3.) 24 Jan 2016
24 Jan 2016 18:29:45
Stoke aren't the physical unit they were of old, but still are effective from set plays. But no matter who we play we are vulnerable to set plays. If he was paired with someone who took control of the back line he would do okay I think.

4.) 25 Jan 2016
25 Jan 2016 00:31:26
Can't be worse than the others who've continued to get roasted by the opposition during set plays.