13 Aug 2019 20:57:26
Hello Ed001,


I just read from a Facebook group that Ryan Kent has removed all photos of him as a Liverpool player on social media as well as unfollowed the club. Also that he's absolutely pissed up that the club has effectively priced him out of a move. Now, I'm sure I once read you're not a big fan of social media and stuff but can you confirm the latter part? And what do you make of all this?

Cheers.

{Ed001's Note - he is unhappy at still being at the club yes. He wanted to go back up to Rangers. No idea about the photos, but I do know he has been posting cryptic messages having a dig at the club. I just don't get it, he is not good enough to mess about with. Take what you can get and get rid. He is never going to make our first team, so let him go and launch his career elsewhere.}

1.) 13 Aug 2019
13 Aug 2019 21:34:28
Thanks for the swift response Ed! Hope this is sorted out quickly. A move abroad, perhaps?

2.) 13 Aug 2019
13 Aug 2019 21:34:28
Thanks for the swift response Ed! Hope this is sorted out quickly. A move abroad, perhaps?

{Ed001's Note - Rangers can still sign players, the Scottish window is not closed yet.}

3.) 14 Aug 2019
14 Aug 2019 11:20:24
Rangers have signed Brandon Parker, assuming that was the other option to Kent.

I would be very surprised if he still was with us by the end of the window.

4.) 14 Aug 2019
14 Aug 2019 12:24:47
ed001 for the scotish young player of the year is 7m to much to ask if he was there player after getting the young player of the year what value would they put on him if so club come calling. my be we should have given him another loan, that will help him grow as a player but if that is was we value him at why should we just letting him go.

{Ed001's Note - it is not exactly a large pool of talent he was competing with mate.}

5.) 14 Aug 2019
14 Aug 2019 13:08:50
If rumours are right, Ryan Kent should focus his anger at Rangers and SG as they have not seen fit to bid for someone who had an asking price dropped from £15m to £7m. and my understanding is that LFC is willing to accept £5m with add-ons.

6.) 14 Aug 2019
14 Aug 2019 13:23:50
Ed001 I know there is not a lot off good players up there but the Scottish teams seem to won’t top prices for there players when selling but never expect to pay anything when buying well Celtic and rangers do any way and just bully every team up there and get there players for next to nothing. But I do think the club should have given him another loan he seemed to get better as the season went in so as long as they was paying all his wages it would have only benefited all 3 parties.

{Ed001's Note - Rangers have only just recently got back on their feet, it is not bullying to not want to overpay.}

7.) 14 Aug 2019
14 Aug 2019 16:01:53
Liverpool should loan him out at the very least. The club wanted to sell Wilson and Kent. They didn't sell either but only Wilson gets to go out on loan? Seems weird to me, makes no sense to keep him.

8.) 15 Aug 2019
15 Aug 2019 00:13:33
Wilson got loaned to Bournemouth a PL team who play a system to suit his style, Brooks flourished in that role last season and injured for a few months, was a great fit for Wilson to move there.

No point in a random loan if it doesn't benefit, Kent showed his standard at rangers last year, we've set our price, another loan means he's a year older and a year less on his contract, why just give him back on loan to them? We're right to seek a permanent transfer at a fair fee.

Wilson's loan is a fresh upgrade in standard of quality team/ league. loaning Kent again to SPL would be of little benefit realistically.

9.) 15 Aug 2019
15 Aug 2019 21:16:28
Ed do you think Wilson was sent to Bournemouth as a token geasture for robbing them blind for Ibe and Smith 😆😆.

{Ed001's Note - haaha no.}

10.) 16 Aug 2019
16 Aug 2019 23:57:23
Solanke for 20 mil too. Those 3 combined for 40+million is atrocious business from Bournemouth 😂.