09 Jan 2019 23:22:27
Hey Ed's,

Noticed a poster on West Ham rumours IRONMIKE sometimes has decent / fairly reliable info on transfer. He's saying Liverpool have bid 65mil for Tarkowski I mean I really hope he's wrong on that one. Crazy fee.

Any Ed's bearing anything regarding that?

{Ed002's Note - No, of course not.}


1.) 10 Jan 2019
10 Jan 2019 06:44:14
£65m for Tarkowski would be absolute madness. He’s barely a footballer. Championship standard player with one good season in his career.


2.) 10 Jan 2019
10 Jan 2019 08:34:13
I haven't seen the lad play enough to have an opinion really, the few games I have seen, I've not been impressed one bit but Ed1 did a profile on him back in June, I'll trust his opinion on him and hope we stay well clear.


3.) 10 Jan 2019
10 Jan 2019 09:49:09
Its all good guys i think he just forgot a decimal point.


4.) 10 Jan 2019
10 Jan 2019 10:41:58
.65mil then?


5.) 10 Jan 2019
10 Jan 2019 13:21:40
He may be avergae, but would an avergae youngish cb not be better than two who can’t play more than 5 games In a row. We’ve said even Matip and Lovren can look good next to Van Dijk!


6.) 10 Jan 2019
10 Jan 2019 13:29:54
Nice one mk lol.


7.) 10 Jan 2019
10 Jan 2019 14:43:26
I have never commented on a transfer rumour on this site before but if you give any credence to the nonsensical link to Tarkowski, totally fabricated by the worthless rag of a tabloid which we all despise and picked up by other lazy media outlets, then I suggest you seek urgent medical attention.


8.) 11 Jan 2019
10 Jan 2019 23:38:19
Personally don't think he's good enough and I would worry if we spent that amount on him.


9.) 12 Jan 2019
12 Jan 2019 11:39:53
VVD type money for Tarkowski, OP? You need to drop that WH poster as a decent source, mate cos clearly he is pulling your leg. I would not pay 6 pounds 5 pence for that poor, shambles of a footballer.